tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11282959.post2216723353242100094..comments2022-12-04T21:32:30.043-05:00Comments on AA6E Station Log: Do Not Read!Martin AA6Ehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14329680325036851280noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11282959.post-41698482504633518262009-04-03T07:34:00.000-04:002009-04-03T07:34:00.000-04:00A few quirks notwithstanding, I still can't get ov...A few quirks notwithstanding, I still can't get over the novelty and convenience of having The Times delivered to my bedside table each morning. As the kids woud say, "way cool!"otheronehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08687551037749271028noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11282959.post-14092403747608227382009-04-03T07:28:00.000-04:002009-04-03T07:28:00.000-04:00I read the Chicago Tribune on my Kindle and so far...I read the Chicago Tribune on my Kindle and so far have not seen bloopers like that. However, sometimes articles appear twice, and sometimes they are in the wrong section. One gets used to that and just shrugs. I do enjoy having it on the Kindle and not having to recycle all that paper. I also subscribe to NY Times latest news which is considered a blog, as opposed to a newspaper, and updates a few times a day.Mary McManushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00504207219135852444noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11282959.post-2839296202410572412009-04-03T06:46:00.000-04:002009-04-03T06:46:00.000-04:00Nice catch, Martin! Makes me feel not so bad about...Nice catch, Martin! Makes me feel not so bad about some of the "infelicities" that have made it into Kindle Nation.<BR/><BR/>Cheers,<BR/>WindwalkerStevehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09761443266089188935noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11282959.post-868469662691685012009-04-02T11:42:00.000-04:002009-04-02T11:42:00.000-04:00Hilarious! I read the San Francisco Chronicle and ...Hilarious! I read the San Francisco Chronicle and the Wall Street Journal on my Kindle. The Chron has bloopers all the time, such as filler text under photographs instead of a description. The WSJ is a lot more careful.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com